An Analysis of Why Settlers Had Conflicting Approach in Regards To British Rules

An Analysis of Why Settlers Had Conflicting Approach in Regards To British Rules Why Did Some Colonists Want to Break Away More Than Others? Although it was the consensus that most colonists opposed being British subjects, some opposed it more than others. Sailors and those in commerce as well as the common family farmer both were some of the most provoked. The colonists were not used to the British imposing their rule as much as it was after the Seven Years War. Wars cost money, this is a fact. The British needed some income in order to pay for it. Being British subjects and being seen as a â€Å"cash cow† the British demanded that the colonists pay their fair share of the war. â€Å"To finance the wars, Britain’s public expenditures, taxes, and national debt rose enormously.† Taxes were imposed on the colonists and became lovingly known as the â€Å"Intolerable Acts†. Some acts passed really weren’t that bad. For example, the Stamp Act, weren’t necessarily bad. It only raised the price of paper nominally, but the British controlled the supply of paper. The British knew who was buying paper and why. The colonists didn’t like this invasion of privacy in the slightest. Some acts, like the Boston Port Act, were much more serious. The closure of the harbor put a major dent in colonial commer ce. This angered sailors. These Intolerable Acts caused uprise in the colonies. Sailors and slaves were so angered a â€Å"motley crew† formed. As Rediker and Linebaugh describe it, they were â€Å"eighty strong and warm with drink and anger† . This group came to protest at the house of Henry Laurens. Laurens was a wealthy Charleston merchant that also happened to be storing the paper that the colonists would be forced to buy from the English. The way of life of sailors and other merchants were threatened and they didn’t take kindly to it. Simple family farmers also heavily opposed these new taxes and the way the colonies were headed as a whole. Obtaining land was becoming harder and British taxes made farm life difficult. Subsistence farming revolved around the idea of self support. These people had no need for money, so they didn’t have much. They produced for themselves and bartered for what they didn’t have. Taxes which were to be paid in real money was difficult. This annoyance angered the farmers. The farmers were particularly aggravated. They left England in order to farm free from government interference and that is exactly what was beginning to happen. Though, there was a group known as Loyalists that did not want to break free from England. For reasons that will be explained shortly this group wanted to remain loyal to the British crown. For reasons ranging from business to politics this group did not want to break away from England. Some held business interests in England and feared breaking off would permanently break them off from one of the biggest markets in the world. Some were employed by England for regulatory reasons. Some were simply too afraid of the uncertainty that came with going up against one of the biggest empires in the world. Elites enjoyed their role in British society and feared in a new society that wouldn’t be so lucky. The common colonists saw a further and further divide between themselves and the British. The British soldiers were crude and uneducated. The colonists at this point were several generations from being British born. This generation was raised in the colonies by colonists. They identified more with other colonists than with the British ruling them. They were reminded of the rigid British class system observing officers and common soldiers interact. They had left England in an attempt to avoid this. This growing feeling of separation as well as the British overstepping their bounds allowed anger and resentment to simmer to the point of revolution. The colonists were about to take on the most powerful empire in the world.

Customer Relationship Management Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2750 words

Customer Relationship Management - Assignment Example CRM is often referred to as ‘relationship marketing’ (Parvatiyar & Sheth, 2001, p. 3) and has much to do with customer acquisition and retention. These processes should, in their turn, be addressed by the whole organization as those playing a key role in organizational success. In addition, modern CRM is the approach that makes companies not simply sell products, but fulfill the needs of the clients by means of creating value. Creating value, in its turn, though is a marketing concept, works as a strategy for building certain relationships with the clients and, in such a way, creating a competitive advantage for the company. The goal of any business is to bring profit via providing clients with goods or services. However, as competition in the globalized market is continuously becoming more and more fierce, companies have to be continuously developing and changing in order to remain competitive. Therefore, the quality of goods and services, the value they bring to the cu stomers and customer satisfaction are the tools for creating competitive advantage in the market.  The value that the good or service carries is to satisfy both the immediate physical and mental needs of a client. Creating value, in its turn, builds customer loyalty that is then expressed in increased sales and profit for the company (Reichheld & Teal, 1996, p. 3). A quite similar is the purpose of achieving customer satisfaction. A satisfied and happy client is more likely to return and purchase the goods or services of the business again. This is directly related to the company’s profit and, hence, opportunities for further growth and development. With the development of social media and communication technologies word of mouth has become an important tool for building a company’s image and brand identity. First of all, since the world has become more interconnected, it is easier for businesses to market their products. At the same time, advanced technologies are o f help to prospects and customers in the process of sharing opinions and experiences related to the company’s product. However, the development of social media and communication technologies is both an opportunity and a threat to businesses. Social media and digital communication channels provide businesses with wider opportunities for marketing their products and communicating the clients. In addition, since people often buy in response to independent positive opinions (Silverman, 2001, p. 6), word of mouth, which is being spread fast nowadays, has even evolved into the appearance of new marketing concepts, such a world of mouth marketing and viral marketing. Making people talk about the product in a positive light is, according to Silverman (2001, p. 6), one of the most effective ways of making people buy the product.

Critical Analysis of a Quantative Study Research Paper

Critical Analysis of a Quantative Study - Research Paper Example When a study is to be conducted, the protection of the human participants or respondents is an issue of primary importance. Essentially, all participants have to be fully aware of their role in the study and what the study is all about. It is important that they are informed of the benefits they can gain from participating in the study as well as the risks that they face. In this particular study by Miyashita, et al. (2006), no particular benefit was provided by the investigators that the respondents stood to gain by participating. The authors also did not provide any risks that the participants face if they agreed to participate in the study. Ideally, the study is supposed to obtain the informed consent of the participants. In this particular study, the respondents were enrolled by the Palliative care units. The respondents were given the freedom to choose on whether not to participate or to participate. It can then be concluded that the study obtained informed consent from the resp ondents. Additionally, the study obtained both scientific and ethical validity from the institutional review boards of hospitals that were participating in the study. With reference to data collection, there are independent and dependent variables. The author identified the variables as follows; the general population and the bereaved family were the dependent variables. The independent variables were the age and sex of the respondents. It is worth noting that the authors failed to overtly demonstrate the significance of obtaining the sex of the respondents as its value to the study was not clearly demonstrated. The authors chose to use questionnaire as the sole means of data collection. The authors did not provide a rationale for choosing to use this method of data collection. It would have beneficial for the authors to state for example why questionnaires were chosen over interviews for data collection. Again, using this method solely as the main method of data collection cast some doubt on the reliability of the data obtained. This is because respondents may give information without understanding the purpose of the study and thereby compromise the accuracy of the data (Creswell, 2008). But, by allowing the respondents to choose whether to respond or not to; they prevented any ethical issues from arising. The questionnaires did not request for any form of information that may be directly associated with any particular individual thereby assuring the respondents their privacy. The authors posted the questionnaires on August 2004 and then October 2004 for those who had failed to reply. The participant was expected to receive the questionnaire sent by mail and fill the information if he is willing to participate in the study. He would then post it back to the investigators. The primary objective of the study was to conceptualise the good death dimensions within the Japanese care center. The study also intended to clarify on the significance of each of the components of good death and explore the factors that influence an individual’s perception of good death. The authors used Cronbach’s alpha coefficients and e xplanatory factor analysis to be able to conceptualize a good death. The factor analysis enabled